TechSoftwareAppsThreads has added a key new feature, and everybody hates itThreads is now automatically sharing some of your posts on Facebook and Instagram, whether you want it to or notWhen you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
TechSoftwareAppsThreads has added a key new feature, and everybody hates itThreads is now automatically sharing some of your posts on Facebook and Instagram, whether you want it to or notWhen you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
Threads is now automatically sharing some of your posts on Facebook and Instagram, whether you want it to or not
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
(Image credit: Future)
(Image credit: Future)
We normally welcome new features on social networks, butThreads' latest wheeze is a terrible idea: it’s automatically sharing some of your posts on Facebook and Instagram, with no way to opt out of the new feature.
According to Threads: “We’ve launched an update to make it easier for people to see the latest content from Threads directly on Facebook and Instagram. But we’re listening to feedback like yours as we continue to build on this.”
The feedback they’re getting, it’s fair to say, isn’t very happy. And it’s making me wonder if Threads, the most credible rival to the dying Twitter, is going to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
What’s wrong with this new Threads feature?
And that’s the second, more serious problem: Threads is sharing Threads posts to social networks that aren’t Threads. For many people, different social networks have different vibes, different purposes and crucially, different people, so for example for me I use Instagram for work/creative stuff, Facebook for old real-life friends and so on. But what Threads is doing here is effectively this:
Me:Post this to Threads, please.Threads:Post it to Instagram! You got it!Me:No, just Threads, please.Threads:Instagram and Facebook! Right on it!
The problem here, I think, is a familiar one: the people who make decisions on social networks aren’t normal people who may have very good reasons not to want to share absolutely everything on every possible network all of the time. It’s an attitude beautifully satirised in Dave Eggers' book The Circle, where a thinly disguised tech firm has the motto “All that happens must be known” and its employees are genuinely baffled that anybody might think otherwise.
Sign up to the T3 newsletter for smarter living straight to your inbox
Get all the latest news, reviews, deals and buying guides on gorgeous tech, home and active products from the T3 experts
The reason is clearly to promote Threads to users of other Meta services and to drive engagement on the new service. But the effect, for me and what looks to be an awful lot of equally disgruntled users, is to make people less likely to post on Threads. Rather than drive engagement, this seems set to reduce it. I sincerely hope Threads will rethink and at the very least add an opt-out – or better still, make it opt-in.
Sky Stream gets a great new trick that unlocks long hidden potentialA Sky Stream puck update gives you a host of new channels
A Sky Stream puck update gives you a host of new channels
If you ever needed proof that cassette players are back, this is itWe Are Rewind has made a portable tape deck so retro it should appear from nowhere in a DeLorean
We Are Rewind has made a portable tape deck so retro it should appear from nowhere in a DeLorean
